CH Walnut Hill Kadance of Gold Hill - S*Esteticas British shorthairs

Pedigree	Search mode Extended Shows 1 - 1 of found 0 of total -, offset limit CH Walnut Hill Kadance of Gold Hill { }
Depth	3 4 5 6 7 10
Type	classic tree circle
Show	images details split positions testmating

CH Walnut Hill Kadance of Gold Hill

Offsprings:

GC Walnut Hill Moondancer

The Cat CH Walnut Hill Kadance of Gold Hill 🔍 PER ns 12	Sire CH Bobette Bacchus of Walnut Hill 🔍 PER ns 11 1972-09-13
	Dam GC Walnut Hill Diamond Jubilee 🔍 PER ns 12

Grandsire GC Walnut Hill Bravado of Bobette 🔍 PER ns 12 1970-03-20	Walnut Hill Bravo of Canterbury 🔍 PER ns 11	GC Walnut Hill Rondo 🔍	PER ns 12
	Walnut Hill Bravo of Canterbury 🔍 PER ns 11	Hayward's Patina of Walnut Hill 🔍	PER ns 11
	GP Walnut Hill Tiffany 🔍 PER ns 12 1966-08-27	GC Las Lomas Julio of Walnut Hill 🔍	PER ns 11
	GP Walnut Hill Tiffany 🔍 PER ns 12 1966-08-27	Walnut Hill Toyette 🔍	PER ns 12
Granddam CH & PR Bobette Lady Suzanne 🔍 PER ns 11	Prince Mecca of Bobette 🔍 PER ns 12	Prince Danny 🔍	PER ns 11
	Prince Mecca of Bobette 🔍 PER ns 12	Candi Lee 🔍	PER ns 12
	Princess Medina of Bobette 🔍 PER ns 12	Prince Danny 🔍	PER ns 11
	Princess Medina of Bobette 🔍 PER ns 12	Candi Lee 🔍	PER ns 12
Grandsire Walnut Hill Bravo of Canterbury 🔍 PER ns 11	GC Walnut Hill Rondo 🔍 PER ns 12 1961-05-21	CH/CFF QCH Gray-Ivy Aladdin 🔍	PER ns 12
	GC Walnut Hill Rondo 🔍 PER ns 12 1961-05-21	Walnut Hill Sweet Sue 🔍	PER ns 12
	Hayward's Patina of Walnut Hill 🔍 PER ns 11	GC Las Lomas Julio of Walnut Hill 🔍	PER ns 11
	Hayward's Patina of Walnut Hill 🔍 PER ns 11	Hayward's Juli-Ann of Walnut Hill 🔍	PER ns 11
Granddam Walnut Hill Kachina Doll 🔍 PER ns 12	Walnut Hill Bravo of Canterbury 🔍 PER ns 11	GC Walnut Hill Rondo 🔍	PER ns 12
	Walnut Hill Bravo of Canterbury 🔍 PER ns 11	Hayward's Patina of Walnut Hill 🔍	PER ns 11
	Sequoia Sparkler of Edelweiss 🔍 PER ns 11	GC Sequoia Sir Laddie 🔍	PER ns 11
	Sequoia Sparkler of Edelweiss 🔍 PER ns 11	CH Sequoia Chiffon of Diadem 🔍	PER ns 11

We can not guarantee that the pedigree information is correct.