GEC Pearl of Empire's Heavengift - S*Esteticas British shorthairs

Pedigree	Search mode Extended Shows 1 - 1 of found 0 of total -, offset limit GEC Pearl of Empire's Heavengift { }
Depth	3 4 5 6 7 10
Type	classic tree circle
Show	images details split positions testmating

GEC Pearl of Empire's Heavengift

Offsprings:

WCH Arnold Lovely Boy

The Cat GEC Pearl of Empire's Heavengift 🔍 BSH ns 11	Sire CH Zozoo Raisings Moon Light 🔍 BSH ns 12
	Dam GIC Pearl of Empire's Revolution in Love 🔍 BSH ns 11 1999-11-07

Grandsire GC Sulver Romeo Fan Liwardia 🔍 BSH ns 11	IC Sulver Cupido Fan Liwardia 🔍 BSH ns 11	EC Quandili-Q de Tuatha de Danann 🔍	BSH ns 11
	IC Sulver Cupido Fan Liwardia 🔍 BSH ns 11	GC Sulver Querina Fan Liwardia 🔍	BSH ns 12
	Beauty Anak Dari Bella 🔍 BSH ns 11	Jadwiga's Karate Kid 🔍	BSH ny 11
	Beauty Anak Dari Bella 🔍 BSH ns 11	Shirley Anak Dari Bella 🔍	BSH ns 12
Granddam Margaret (BSH)🔍 BSH ns 12	WCH Pearl of Empire's Leonardo da Vinci 🔍 BSH ns 11	GIC Fernando van Ybloske-Eksolby 🔍	BSH ns 11
	WCH Pearl of Empire's Leonardo da Vinci 🔍 BSH ns 11	WCH Kristie von Maringo 🔍	BSH ns 11
	CH Esty Argend Blond 🔍 BSH ns 11	GIC Fernando van Ybloske-Eksolby 🔍	BSH ns 11
	CH Esty Argend Blond 🔍 BSH ns 11	CH Charmain Argend Blond 🔍	BSH ns 11
Grandsire WCH Pearl of Empire's Magallanus 🔍 BSH ns 11 1996-12-28	GIC Fernando van Ybloske-Eksolby 🔍 BSH ns 11	GIC Ruedisuelis Xoebiedoe Sjefke 🔍	BSH ns 11
	GIC Fernando van Ybloske-Eksolby 🔍 BSH ns 11	Ursili Sisi Ramek van Altere 🔍	BSH ns 11
	WCH Kristie von Maringo 🔍 BSH ns 11 1994-07-02	F. Roosevelt von Kaiserberg 🔍	BSH ns 11
	WCH Kristie von Maringo 🔍 BSH ns 11 1994-07-02	Opium von Romero 🔍	BSH ns 11
Granddam WCH Kristie von Maringo 🔍 BSH ns 11 1994-07-02	F. Roosevelt von Kaiserberg 🔍 BSH ns 11	IC Marvellous Golden Gigolo 🔍	BSH ny 11
	F. Roosevelt von Kaiserberg 🔍 BSH ns 11	GC Laetitia von Ursus Major 🔍	BSH ns 11
	Opium von Romero 🔍 BSH ns 11	GC Rudy vom Bleek 🔍	BSH ns 11
	Opium von Romero 🔍 BSH ns 11	CH Vanessa von Romero 🔍	BSH ns 11

We can not guarantee that the pedigree information is correct.