CH Diamond-PRO Edelweiss - S*Esteticas British shorthairs

Pedigree	Search mode Extended Shows 1 - 1 of found 0 of total -, offset limit CH Diamond-PRO Edelweiss { }
Depth	3 4 5 6 7 10
Type	classic tree circle
Show	images details split positions testmating

CH Diamond-PRO Edelweiss

Offsprings:

Diego from Gloryhill

The Cat CH Diamond-PRO Edelweiss 🔍 BLH ns 11	Sire IC Tobi of Sarsen Stones 🔍 BSH ns 11
	Dam Jaki Ami Sissy Crazy Blue 🔍 BSH ns 11 33

Grandsire GIC Escalus Prinz vom Cillawaeldchen (Paul)🔍 BSH ns 11 2001-11-26	CH Pennydown Maverick 🔍 BSH ns 11 1999-09-19	GC Pennydown Top Gunn 🔍	BSH ns 11
	CH Pennydown Maverick 🔍 BSH ns 11 1999-09-19	GC Greendale Moneypenny 🔍	BSH ns 11
	IC Xanadu vom Maegdebrunnen (Xani)🔍 BSH ns 11 1999-06-07	CH Faust de la Luciere 🔍	BSH ns 11
	IC Xanadu vom Maegdebrunnen (Xani)🔍 BSH ns 11 1999-06-07	CH Scambola vom Maegdebrunnen 🔍	BSH ns 11
Granddam EC Silver Oberta Fan Liwardia 🔍 BSH ns 12 1996-09-20	EC Quandili-Q de Tuatha de Danann 🔍 BSH ns 11	Patchouli de Tuatha de Danann 🔍	BSH ns 11
	EC Quandili-Q de Tuatha de Danann 🔍 BSH ns 11	Oshilla de Tuatha-de-Danann 🔍	BSH ns 11
	GIC Silver-Sheba van de Oldehove 🔍 BSH ns 12	Marvellous Silverprince 🔍	BSH ns 12
	GIC Silver-Sheba van de Oldehove 🔍 BSH ns 12	Pemberley's Silver Kassandra 🔍	BSH ns 11
Grandsire SC Harry vom Koberland 🔍 BSH n 21 33 2003-11-08	IC Angelo vom Koberland 🔍 BSH c 33	WCH Diogenes vom Rosenzweig 🔍	BSH c 33
	IC Angelo vom Koberland 🔍 BSH c 33	CH Bharati's Salima 🔍	BSH b 33
	Bonita vom Koberland 🔍 BSH fs 33	Wanja von Wahrberg 🔍	BSH ny 11 33
	Bonita vom Koberland 🔍 BSH fs 33	CH Lucie-Ginelli vom Schloss Blaumühlen 🔍	BSH g 33
Granddam Birdy of New Celtic Henge 🔍 BSH ns 12 33 2001-08-23	IC Valisa's Fantasy 🔍 BSH ns 11	EC Lucky of New Celtic Henge 🔍	BSH ns 11
	IC Valisa's Fantasy 🔍 BSH ns 11	Valisa's Emily 🔍	BSH ns 11
	EC Gipsy of New Celtic Henge 🔍 BSH ns 11	EC Darius-Doethe vom Edelfels 🔍	BSH ns 11
	EC Gipsy of New Celtic Henge 🔍 BSH ns 11	CH Belia vom Haus Fasler 🔍	BSH ns 12

We can not guarantee that the pedigree information is correct.